Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC LensCheck Price (Amazon): https://amzn.to/2MOUFeOExample Images: https://astrobackyard.com/rokinon-135mm-f2-astrophotography/I've . Here's what I see from the photographs:#1: Woman in traffic. But I hardly used it in the 30+ years. The best 200mm lens is precisely the older 200mm F4 SMC Takumar, which comes with the M42 camera thread, and requires the M42-EOS adapter. I loved the Nikon 80-400G for a year, or so, and then found everything with it wrong, and got rid of it. Excellent color and saturation, a virtually perfect lens. Rokinon FE14M-C Lens. Deserves to be in the camera hall of fame. Great post; thanks for the detailed information. My Canon EOS 60Da with the Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 mounted to a Fornax Mounts LighTrack II. Diffraction from the cheap EF-s kit zoom lens was uneven. If 135mm f2 works for you, then fine. The flat lens hood is great for taking flat frames after a night of astrophotography. f/2! As you'd expect though, distortion and light falloff are both higher with a full-frame image circle, but perhaps not as much as you'd normally expect. Not only does the Rokinon 135 add additional reach, but I can also now shoot at F/2, instead of F/4 on the Canon. Overall, spectacular lens. The Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC is one of the most affordable and practical lenses for astrophotography on the market. Before I go any further, Id like to share a photo from Gabriel Millou of the Andromeda Galaxy using a Canon 1300D. Seems to me that with your gallery and website of images you should refrain from passing judgment on who is and isn't a photography master. I use the word design, because although the available 135mm F2 lenses aren't the exact same optical formula, they share many important traits. This lens has only two drawbacks. With a rounded 9-blade diaphragm, shallow depth of field imaging will be rendered with pleasing out-of-focus highlights. Show some humility and don't troll. The first telephoto lens of choice, especially recommended for beginners, is the 135mm F2.5 SMC Pentax. +1 for the 135mm lens. This is a fully manual lens, meaning that it does not have autofocus, and you must manually select the f-stop . 45 minutes. Photography is art and technology, the latter serving the first.Photography is not something arty with a lot of gadgetry. These were just a tad less sharp at the corners than their Canon competition, but certainly extremely sharp all over the field if closed down one stop or even half a stop. Beautiful portrait lens. Yes, there is some sharpness added when stopping down to f4 or f5.6 but after that it doesn't get better. The flawless image quality is only half the story though. You may need to stop down to control star bloat, and thats exactly what Ive done with this 135. Not heavy like the white tele-zooms. And because you can shoot between F/2 and F/4, plenty of light reaches the sensor in a relatively short exposure. I would never shell out hundreds of euros for a 135 prime let alone one with manual focus. I have used the canon 70-200 f2.8L ii and also the 100-400 f4.5/5.6 L with excellent results. I have no experience with that lens, Jerry Lodriguss however published a review of that lens on his websitehttp://www.astropix.NIKON_180MM.HTM. Digital camera types . Thanks & Cheers We were very impressed with X-T5's 40-megapixel APS-C sensor, check out some full resolution images! Light weight and robust. I want to see the bokeh and the sharpness at 100% mag, don't care about the photos. $218.00 for 7 days. I do know, however, that I can take an equally framed photo I've shot with my Canon kit lens, both zoomed to 100% I run circles around this guy. My copy has very stiff manual focus though and is quite heavy. In photoshop I love to zoom 200, 300 and even 400% to see the extreme details it is an absolutely amazing lens, great backround blur, great for low light weddings with available light. For example, a friend recently recommended Pentax 6x7 prime lenses which were designed for a large format flat field, and are also adaptable to the EOS system. If you're using or are looking to buy the Samyang or Rokinon 135mm F/2, please let me know what you're imaging with it or any questions you may have in the comment section below. (purchased for $1,000), reviewed January 1st, 2007 It could easily rival 'bokeh monsters lenses' at fraction of their price. If you buy a nifty fifty or a 100mm macro lens you simply cannot go wrongyou will get a great and handy lens for your money, with great image quality. Cost. PRICE. One of the prime examples of such a design is the "nifty fifty"the 50mm F1.8 lens construction that many lens manufacturers provide. The best of them, Nikon's 70-200E, is just as sharp all but the very best primes - ie, already too sharp for most portrait work. As it is it is earns a 9. If so, which one? . Bokeh is buttery smooth, best you can get from a 135mm. (purchased for $860), reviewed March 9th, 2017 Selecting between it and the 200mm Takumar was not an easy choice but, in the end, I chose the Takumar because it seemed to have slightly better contrast. (purchased for $899), reviewed December 9th, 2006 I have just acquired my astrophotography set up thanks to all your videos and doing some research. Even if the background is very close to your subject, somehow the optical construction in the 135mm lens will still manage to separate the background beautifully. I understand the optical design is quite old. Canon 300/4 ED IF AF (non-IS) Imaging Resource 1998 - 2023. Yet the Jaegers becomes essentially color free when stopped down to 3in. And you can even crop a 135 efl with today's sensors should you actually need it. The main problem with the old lenses is spherical aberration and colour error, especially pronounced on digital sensors. Canon EOS 60Da with the Rokinon 135mm F/2 lens. I guess thats where practice will come in handy. For those of you that like to pixel-peep, have a look at the single image frame captured using the Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC at F/4. Crazy fast AF! http://www.idyll.com/laneysat There are a total of 8 stops actually written on the lens. Now I wonder why people are never happy even on 3rd day of a new year :) Come on guys just think "Micael Widell" was working over holiday period to publish this free article ;). Particular properties of modern 135/2 lenses are resolution with e.g. The 135mm f2 is by all accounts one of their better and more reliable lenses however I believe the chance of a defective lens is lower with the Canon. Film Friday: DPRTV reviews Fujifilm's Acros II film, Fujifilm launches Instax Mini 12 instant camera, DPReview March Madness, vote for your champions, Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM sample gallery (DPReview TV), OM System M. Zuiko 90mm F3.5 Macro sample gallery, Live from Japan: Highlights from CP+ 2023, Retro Review: 24 years later, the Sony F505 is still pretty cool, Hands on with the OM System M. Zuiko 90mm F3.5 Macro, New FAA rules make it easier for recreational drone pilots to fly in restricted US airspaces, Leica marks James Bond's 60th* with a special edition D-Lux 7, Film Friday: A closer look at the Pentax KX, an original K-mount SLR, Blackmagic Design announces a new Studio Camera 6K Pro, National Geographic selects Pictures of the Year photo contest winner, Sigma brings DC DN APS-C primes to Nikon Z-mount, Panasonic Lumix S 14-28mm F4-5.6 Macro sample gallery, Tamron announces 11-20mm F2.8 ultra-wide zoom for Fujifilm X-mount, Film Friday: DPReview TV steps back in time to shoot APS film, Finer Points: Here's an easy way to improve video autofocus, DPReview TV: One simple fix to improve video autofocus, Head-to-head: Adobe Super Resolution vs. ON1 Resize AI vs. Topaz Labs Gigapixel AI, Waiting for the fishy in the little dishy by Gil Aegerter, Lava Lizard on Marine Iguana by ZimmWisdom. They create a beautiful, mesmerizing dreamscape in their photos, and their secret weapon, besides an impeccable sense for aesthetics, is the 135mm F2 lens. There have been a lot of Tele-Tessars over the years. There is no such thing, in my opinion. Im currently shooting with a Canon 60D. The Heart and Soul Nebulae captured using a DSLR and the Rokinon 135mm lens. Looking forward to allow purchasing the Canon 200mm f/2.8L II USM. This brings me to my question. I would be careful with the Nikon 135 f/2 DC (I have one). Together they still weight less than any modern 135mm :>. The clip-in Astronomik 12nm Ha is one of their most popular filters ever and for good reason! We were surprised by just how much difference there was between these AI-powered image enlargers. I know taste is subjective, but it seems to me that some people have become obsessed with blur and bokeh. No rear seals - since the 17-40 Canon has added rear seals to L lenses, to help in weather sealing. (purchased for $1,000), reviewed February 4th, 2010 If you aren't completely set on the 135mm, the 200mm f/2.8L is a fantastic lens and i think its less expensive than the 135mm f/2L. Another thing that makes people go "wow" over the 135mm F2 lens design is the bokeh, which can be so creamy that distant backgrounds almost render as gradients. Along with improvements in telescope mounts, camera technology, filters, and digital image processing, these have allowed amateurs to produce astrophotographs of nearly professional quality. Preaching to the choir! I got mine for $60.00 on Craigslist but seen them on eBay for $100 and less all the time. Write your own user review for this lens. Perhaps I missed it, but did you use a clip-in light pollution filter with your 60D and this lens? The other one is the inevitable and persistent regret that, because of chromatic aberration, the full 75mm aperture of this beautiful lens can not be used in full visible spectrum photography. Check out Seems like a great lens. Meanwhile the ol' Canon 135/2 is still commanding a higher than average price on the used market (70%+ of MSRP isn't common), I guess the low weight and super easy resale have almost made it a high end commodity. On FF I use this lens for both tight portraits and landscape shots. I rarely shoot static landscapes or posed, composed images. Just place your subject against a distant background, and half of the job is done. When I was teaching photography in 70's at a junior college, I critiqued students photos, but I never did so harshly. http://www.flickr.com/photos/tbrigham/284303834/. Unfortunately I haven't more the Canon lens. Sharp, handy, strong colours and contrast. First of all, the background separation and the bokeh: I had photographed lots of animals in bushes before, but never before had I seen the bush melt away in the way it did with the 135mm lens. It can isolate subject while being tack sharp with beautiful creamy bokeh when used at f2. Not rude at all, a fair comment. Interesting. The first example is good to show that you can take photos of persons in front of an ugly background without completely ruining the shot (important for people shooting events), the last one is the only one I really like (because of the color) but you could shoot this with any lens with short MFD. No more inside shooting with flash! You currently have javascript disabled. Beware others critical comments here about how flat these images look, the author has chosen specific topics and viewpoints to highlight f2 with this lens, so see the wow review for what it is please and the negative comments need placing in context. Thanks for the fine article and the thought you put into it. I have a Nikon d 500. Are you really using 135 a lot? Of course, when it comes to astrophotography, this can create some challenges as well. As in all arts the client's likes influence the result up to a point. At least not in my camera (Sony A6000), the focal length in a crop sensor does not make it very suitable for portrait, the photo detail is something else, but without AF that type of photography with that focal distance and at least 80 cm of the subject it requires too much dedication, with how comfortable the DMF approach mode is for that type of photography Also in my mount it does not have any communication with the camera (it does not have a chip, it only has it for Nikon). Prime lenses are typically lighter as they do not need the additional glass and mechanics required to zoom at varying magnifications. A coupe of stage shows, one very recent, and a random collection using this lens exclusively Latter looks quite professional.. I would like to make this work with the Nikkor 180mm ED (i.e., what I have versus what I cannot havelol). My Rokinon 135F2 on my crop body is fun to play with.. a budget lens with budget construction on a discontinued camera system.. but hey im just a ham and egger https://flic.kr/p/21nj82V, I had a Canon 135/2 for a while, but I decided I preferred the 100 L used not as a Macro but a normal lens (which my non-L USM 100 Macro was quite poor for). Of the 150 images I considered fit to publish, only 4 were made with the 135. When stopped down to 37mm, at F5.4, it also produces perfect, small and round star images across the entire field. The only reason i sell this lens is because of versatility. I use it to photograph highschool basketball in poor light. Weight. The Japanese word "bokeh" can be translated into English as "blur". The 70-200L being a much more useful lens. With weather sealing this would be a 10. Besides lack of IS, the only major issue I have with this lens is flare. To achieve creamy bokeh, a lens should have a wide maximum aperture and a long focal length. Above $2500 cameras tend to become increasingly specialized, making it difficult to select a 'best' option. I just purchased a very lightly used Canon 200mm F2.8L II USM for $620 from a great online dealer and can't wait for an opportunity to try it out with my Astronomik CLS clip on a T4i at a dark site. The diameter of the lens is 77mm, with a non-rotating filter mount on the objective lens. I shoot dozens of weddings every year but the 135mm stayed in my bag a majority of the time; I just didn't find myself needing to use it. Sometimes though, we stumble upon a great lens design which is strong in all three. I need fast auto-focus, predictable focus lock and natural, vibrant color rendition. I use it routinely in preference to many other multicoated filters I tested, including the new Hoya MC UV. "Bokeru" is a verb, and it can apply equally to to optical and psychological effects, including the reduced mental clarity that can some with age. f1.4 was a necessisty rather than a creative luxury. Test Notes In the right hands this lens really does have "magic pixie dust", as a friend once described. It is sharp but somehow not that analytic way as a macro lens. The cat is a case for the bit bucket i my opinion - it has no composition, a distracting background and a random parts of the body in focus - the same picture made with a smart phone could not look worse. To shoot indoors under typical gymnasium lighting, you often need f/2.0 or wider to get a shutter speed high enough to stop the action. One of my very best lenses! A series of such images can be digitally stacked to produce excellent results. I have been following your work both on YT and here from Japan for a while. 85 Is a different story, my 85 gets used a lot. The next 200mm lens of excellent quality is the 200mm F4 Nikkor F which requires the Nikon F to EOS adapter. Be careful with the focus. Here are our top picks for the canon lenses for astrophotography. The criterion I used in evaluating lenses was optical perfection with no reservations. After a three-year hiatus, we've been at the return of the CP+ camera show in Yokohama, Japan. Great looking lens, if you ever saw it from the front. This thing is a beast in comparison. It improves slightly stopped down. Large emission nebulae like the California Nebula (pictured below) are a great choice for this focal length. Great reach for street shots. I would love to see his test images. This is so annoying that I intend to replace the Canon lens cap with a Tamron cap. But in the rush to make hybrids why are aren't we giving video shooters the tools they need? This makes me feel I shall take the Zeiss 85F1.8 off my A6000 or maybe NOT, it's just another hype article about "A" lens. Love the shot of the blue anemone, which also displays nice bokeh, and blur! That whole rig comes to about $1200, minus the mount. I shoot it wide open 90% of the time. :). Due to the weight, at times I didn't move my shooting position and just zoomed to a composition that worked. If anything the argument in favor of even smaller and lighter 85/1.4s (like the 600g Sigma DN) is stronger than ever, and I say that as someone that loves shooting at 135-150mm. The shallow depth of field present at its maximum aperture does indeed create a pleasing bokeh. These are affordably available on eBay, and result in perfectly round star images, the way nature intended them to be. Ive set the f-stop to F/2.8, to sharpen up the stars a bit. Lens hood - when I bought this lens years ago the included hood was rather cheap (perhaps Canon has updated the hood) by comparison with other hoods. This lens is available for several camera mounts, including Nikon, Sony, Pentax, Samsung, and Fuji. Any experience with this camera and would this lens be a good fit? It actually makes my eyes water as I try to resolve how bad the blurriness is. This is a fully manual lens, meaning that it does not have autofocus, and you must manually select the f-stop using the aperture ring at the base of the lens. Sure, that would be swellbut it doesn't matter with regard to how it performs. Far from being a generic run-of-the-mill image hosting website, it was created and is still operated by an astrophotographer, and boasts features that are very specific to astrophotography. The lens hood is not petal-shaped, which is great news for those using this lens for astrophotography. I have the Canon EF 135mm, f2L USM. The original poster is right that it was a compromise though and stopping down was necessary for critical sharpness and a better image. Another example is the 100mm (or sometimes 90mm) F2.8 macro lens. A single, 90-second exposure using the Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC at F/4. IS is useful in my f/4 zooms but I don't need it to hand-hold this lens. I think the bokeh won me over with the cat, as well as the fact that I like animals; the case for the duck was the same. Besides, adding IS would mean adding extra elements and that would very likely reduce the image quality. I got this lens because of portraiture. But like a glitch in the matrix, an anomaly that shouldn't exist, you can get the Samyang/Rokinon 135mm for as little as $430 brand new. A higher-res Blackmagic Studio Camera just dropped. Zoom lenses are entirely unsuitable for astrophotography due to prominent aberrations of every kind. 135mm and 200mm lenses are suitable for wide angle star-field views, and comet and asteroid hunting, while 300mm lenses serve very well for the Andromeda galaxy, large emission nebulae, open clusters, and even larger globular clusters. I got many great shots from this lens but also missed ton of shots due manual focus only. Writer Anno Huidekoper takes a look at what this manual SLR can do and how it stacks up to its contemporaries. Every different lens design has different "bokeh" even when the lenses are by specs same, like Canon 135mm f/2 vs Samyang 135mm f/2 are both same, but both render differently, even when both have same DOF. You are entitled to your opinions, and I respect that! Lots of older lenses no longer satisfy. If they could make 135 f2 lighter version with AF for Sony and price is slightly under Sigma 135 /1.8 and obviously Batis 135 2.8 it could sell like hotcakes. This article was originally published on Micael's blog, and is being republished in full with express permission. It must not be confused with the much cheaper SMC Takumar, often deceptively advertised as SMC Pentax Takumar, which has the M42 camera thread, and is plagued with unextinguishable blue chromatic aberration. To achieve creamy bokeh, a lens should have a wide maximum aperture and a long focal length. I find neither the cat nor the duck particularly good. Read on to find out which you should be using and why! Not another article that promotes portraits shot with wide open lens and out of focus highlights in the background. This lens flares easily and the flare can be especially ugly if a sun or flash are in the frame. This is huge for me, as it allows me to be much more nimble with getting the right composition and angle. Most of the available 135mm F2 lenses have a very short minimum focusing distance in relation to the focal length, creating a magnification ratio of around 0.2 - 0.25. They account for much of the disagreement that we see on-line (but not for the rudeness and viciousness of some of it). Otherwise I might not achieve focus? The 135mm F2 lens design is truly special, and in this article (and the video I made), I want to try to convince you as well. Not only does it let you travel light, but impressive wide field projects are often more successful when captured under a dark sky. This way you get both lenses with only one! @juksu - you're such a liar. I already did some trials with the Samyang 12mm lens. I think they are an outstanding value for any wide-field astrophotographer, and are particularly suitable for newcomers. (cont. Well, after lugging that lens around for years, I'm experimenting with adding the 135L back to my kit. - in my subjects' skin. the EOS-clip filters are compatible with all EF lenses but not with the EF-s. These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both the speed and focus to capture fast action and offer professional-level image quality.

Cease And Desist Letter To Family Member, Bartow County Mugshots 2021, Articles C